The modern dialogue around medications and medical interventions has moved over much terrain in the last 100-200 years. Some of this is for the better, of course. Some of this change has served to make physicians, nurses, and pharmacists into nothing but rule following (algorithms and guidelines) technicians with no ability to read the patient in front of them. Papers, journals, conferences, and RCTs are excellent source of data, no one will refute that. However, the art of listening to a patient, really listening to them, and then using one’s knowledge to discern the way forward in the messy world of diagnosis is now almost completely lost. There are those like David Healy who will speak about this (Link) but many of us choose to ignore the patient or patients in front of us in favour of the biggest and baddest recent RCT.
Real world data has been ignored to the absolute detriment of patient care. Clinicians can look at death rates in Uttar Pradesh in India before/after deployment of Ivermectin and simply scoff and say something snobbish about it not being an RCT. Go look at the graphs, if you dont believe me. India was all over western news as being completely slammed with COVID-19. The solution was not vaccines but Ivermectin. Remarkable. Many forget that Thalidomide had been studied in one of the first Randomized Controlled Trials to be done to obtain drug approval. Thalidomide was ‘not shown’ to cause Phocomelia ( malformation in limb development) in the trial. If inquiring clinicians had waited until suddenly someone did an RCT to find ‘the real data’ or ‘the science’ then only further disaster could have come from that. Instead, living breathing people (doctors and nurses and all sorts of healthcare professionals) assessed and looked at living breathing human beings (patients who had abnormal limb development or whose children had this) and began making associations. Today, those ringing the alarm bells about something like Thalidomide would have simply had their post or articles taken down as misinformation or perhaps twitter would have decided their journal article was ‘misleading’. We need to regain the ability to look at our patients and to see that they hold all the answers, we just need to development the discerment to see it. We need to look at real world data and begin opening our eyes to what is happening.
Pfizer’s data indicated that the vaxx would prevent 90+% of infections even if it completely had 0 impact on all cause mortality. The world did not batt an eye and said this was the way forward. But then we see the data in a place like Ontario indicating this with covid infection rates;
And unfortunately if you take data farther back, you will see that we knew this some time ago;
So, if there is no change in all cause mortality (this is from the Pfizer paper itself) and there is a higher RATE of cases in the vaccinated, what are we doing?
Now I will show you some really intriguing nation wide data from Canada that should be a little unsettling. Yes this is not an RCT but we saved alot of people the loss of their limbs by not waiting to do ANOTHER RCT on Thalidomide to prove that it had harms, we just opened our eyes.
Canada Data
(Obtainable here: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html#a9)
Here is the number of hospitalizations, deaths and cases across those who are unvaxxed, not fully protected (double vaxxed but not yet 14 days since 2nd shot), partially protected (1 shot), fully vaxxed and fully vaxxed + boosted. This data has been collected since December 14, 2020 - the first day the shots were distributed in Canada.
It looks good, doesn’t it? Lets clear a few things up. The columns are almost seemingly meant to obfuscate. Look at the first column (unvaxx) and the 3rd line (hospitalizations). The percentage (64.4%) makes it look almost like 64.4% of the unvaxxed go to hospital. If you are paying attention, you realize the numbers don’t add up and that infact the percentage refers to the overall percentage of those who were hospitalized were unvaxxed at the time (ie, 47, 303 is 64.4% of 73,506, not 913,383). Beyond this point of poorly laid out details stands a very interesting other point.
The above data was collected starting December 14, 2020. Here is the graph of covid vaccination numbers in Canada;
So, if Canada does not reach 50% vaccination until July 19, 2021 then that means there are 7 months of data where it is absolutely not apples to apples but apples to oranges. Oh and by the way, this is an infectious disease. Infectious diseases tend to pick off the elderly or the sick to begin with because they are simply more susceptible. So this comparison is really NOT apples to apples. Many of the very sick or very elderly died early on and would have been in the ‘unvaccinated’ group even if it hadnt been available to them yet. It is also true that in infectious disease, our ability to treat illness improves over time. This ranges from ventilator settings to supportive therapies to ensuring early steroid treatment etc.
There is something yet more disconcerting than this graphic. If we have this sort of data, then what we should see with safe and effective vaccines is the deaths skewing more and more into the unvaccinated group over time and this also applies to hospitalizations. Now compare my screenshot of the Canada Covid data dating back to September 18, 2021;
Let me walk you through thse two tables to make some sense of all these numbers. First look at the absolute difference in case numbers, hospitalizations, and deaths.
From Dec 14 2020 to Sept 18 2021 (9 months) there were 765,235 cases (all of the numbers here are those for which vaccination status is available).
But from Sept 2021 to Feb 2022 (5 months) there were 1,818,058 - 765, 235 = 1,052,823 cases.From Dec 2020 to Sept 2021 there were 40,939 hospitalizations. But from Sept 2021 to Feb 2022 there were 73,506 - 40,939 = 32,567 hospitalizations
Simple math allows one to see that this rate of hospitalizations (if you assumed a steady rate which we do not have) would mean 58600+ hospitalizations over 9 months (higher than the previous 9 months)
From Dec 2020 to Sept 2021 there were 8580 deaths. But from Sept 2021 to Feb 2022 there were 14,276 - 8580 = 5696 deaths.
Same assumption as above would mean 10,200+ deaths (also higher than the previous 9 months).
Now I know what you are all thinking. “Its the damn unvaccinated people who are causing this”. Think twice. I will show you some table summaries of the data and we can discern where the increases in cases, hospitalizations and death are coming from.
Case Numbers
We saw an increase in cases overall of 1,052,823 cases between Sept 2021 to Feb 2022. It turns out that 735,657 of them came in those who were either double vaxxed or double vaxxed and booster. That means that 70% of new cases were in the vaccinated. Even at a vaccination rate of 81% - this means that the case rise is nearly concordant with the population - this translates to almost no reduction in cases between being vaccinated or not.
Now its left to wonder if those getting infected while vaxxed are really better off. The study done by the drug companies did not show this but what does the real world data show?
Hospitalizations
So the cases rose by 32,567 from Sept 2021 to Feb 2022. Again, the fully vaxxed (and/or boosted) made up 17,389 (53.3%) of these hospitalizations. The unvaxxed made up 13,134 (40%) of those hospitalizations.
Even if the vaxxed are 81% of the population, we wouldnt expect these numbers to be close. One doesnt’ assume that about 50% of the cases of measles or rubella in an outbreak will consist of those already vaccinated to it. Vaccinations are meant to effectively halt the process of infection into the host. The fact that there was a 1341% rise in hospitalizations of those receiving 2 shots or more and that they made up 50+% of the new hospitalizations should really disturb us.
Deaths
Deaths rose by 5696 from September 2021 to Feb 2022 and 3118 (54.7%) of these occurred in those receiving 2+ shots. Only 2302 (40.4)% of the deaths were in those unvaxxed.
Again, one would not assume that Haemophilus influenza b (a bug that used to cause lots of serious meningitis infections in children) related deaths would happen with a 50/50 distribution between vaxxed and unvaxxed.
As of September 18, 2021 Canada had a vaxx rate of 69.4% (fully immunized). The vaxx rate as of Feb 13, 2022 was 80.6%. To have a 511% rise in deaths in the fully vaxxed despite only a change of vaccinations approximating 11% means that this isnt as easy saying that the higher number of the vaxxed will skew the deaths in that direction.
An extremely salient point that is little spoken of is that we shouldnt be expecting the vulnerability to serious infections, deaths and negative outcomes to be the same. As mentioned above, we have learned lots about ventilator settings, using steroids, symptoms of COVID-19 etc. We have chosen to ignore the positive Ivermectin data but thats a discussion for another day. Either way, the farther we are into a pandemic, irrespective of variants, we shouldnt be seeing the same deadliness to this illness but a softening. Those who were most vulnerable and elderly would have formed the first cohort of those dying from this illness. These continued negative outcomes is therefore happening in a relatively younger, relatively healthier cohort. We shouldn’t be seeing this pattern and according to the most modern ‘science’ we should be seeing lives saved in droves from vaxx and this is simply not what we are seeing.
Conclusion
We must open our eyes. The majority (over 50%) of the hospitalizations and deaths since September 2021 have been in those with atleast 2 shots. This is not the picture that the news or our propagandist politicians have been spouting off. With evidence that these shots can be reverse transcribed and enter into the nucleus in a hepatic (liver) cell line and with VAERS having blown up with reports, these shots had better be worth the risk. For all intents and purposes, they are not. The ‘vaxxed’ have made up more of the cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the last 5 months and there is no signs that this is going to change with our hospitalizations consistently being about 75/25 vaxxed/unvaxxed. So, when will we begin to see?
Great Analysis. I just drilled into some of the exact same info and noticed that you may have overlooked one serious issue with the PHAC data in that there are 8k deaths missing from Table 2 based on historical and current data. My look was Omicron Specific and had to work without this data but I do have it explained as well as the dates used and calculation of Risks from Morbidity to Mortality - absolutely no benefit to the jabs.
https://sheldonyakiwchuk.substack.com/p/vaccine-effectiveness-and-covid-omicron?s=w
p.s. On re-reading I see this:
" Pfizer’s data indicated that the vaxx would prevent 90+% of infections even if it completely had 0 impact on all cause mortality "
This is surely not right? Pfizer's data showed that their vax would cause an increase of 0.1% in Immune System efficacy.
90+% of infections were already 'prevented' . i.e. successfully dealt with by the Immune System.
After the vax the figure went up 0.1%.
At a pretty horrific cost when looked at in toto. We still haven't go anywhere near counting it all up.
Sloppy language sending entirely the wrong message.